MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0284649

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2023

Translating trait to state assessment: The case of grandiose narcissism.

Heyde Fien, Wille Bart, Kuijpers Evy, Vergauwe Jasmine, Hofmans Joeri

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Although interest in within-person variability in grandiose narcissism is growing, measurement tools are lacking that allow studying fluctuations in this personality characteristic in a differentiated manner (i.e., distinguishing narcissistic admiration and rivalry). This study explores whether a measurement approach using the six-item version of the Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale (NGS Rosenthal et al. (2007)) and six additional newly formulated adjectives allows assessing state admiration and rivalry. Structural characteristics and convergent validity of this approach were examined in an experience sampling study in which 114 adults participated, providing state assessments twice a day (total number of observations = 1306). Multilevel bifactor analyses revealed three factors (i.e., one general and two specific factors) at both within- and between-person levels. Further, admiration and rivalry showed a pattern of within-person associations with fluctuations in self-esteem and Big Five states that were consistent with theoretical expectations. Finally, average state admiration and average state rivalry correlated substantively with trait measures of these respective constructs assessed one week prior to the experience sampling design.

Для цитирования: Heyde Fien, Wille Bart, Kuijpers Evy, Vergauwe Jasmine, Hofmans Joeri. Translating trait to state assessment: The case of grandiose narcissism.. PloS one. 2023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284649.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.