Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2023
Cardiac MRI-derived Extracellular Volume Fraction versus Myocardium-to-Lumen R1 Ratio at Postcontrast T1 Mapping for Detecting Cardiac Amyloidosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kidoh Masafumi, Oda Seitaro, Takashio Seiji, Kawano Yawara, Hayashi Hidetaka, Morita Kosuke, Emoto Takafumi, Shigematsu Shinsuke, Yoshimura Fumihiro, Nakaura Takeshi, Nagayama Yasunori, Matsuoka Masao, Ueda Mitsuharu, Tsujita Kenichi, Hirai Toshinori
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of myocardium-to-lumen R1 (1/T1) ratio on postcontrast T1 maps for the detection of cardiac amyloidosis in a large patient sample.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent MRI-derived extracellular volume fraction (MRI ECV) analysis between March 2017 and July 2021 because of known or suspected heart failure or cardiomyopathy. Pre- and postcontrast T1 maps were generated using the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence. Diagnostic performances of MRI ECV and myocardium-to-lumen R1 ratio on postcontrast T1 maps (a simplified index not requiring a native T1 map and hematocrit level data) for detecting cardiac amyloidosis were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.
RESULTS: Of 352 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 16 [SD]; 235 men), 136 had cardiac amyloidosis. MRI ECV showed 89.0% (121 of 136; 95% CI: 82%, 94%) sensitivity and 98.6% (213 of 216; 95% CI: 96%, 100%) specificity for helping detect cardiac amyloidosis (cutoff value of 40% [AUC, 0.99 {95% CI: 0.97, 1.00}; P < .001]). Postcontrast myocardium-to-lumen R1 ratio showed 92.6% (126 of 136; 95% CI: 89%, 96%) sensitivity and 93.1% (201 of 216; 95% CI: 89%, 96%) specificity (cutoff value of 0.84 [AUC, 0.98 {95% CI: 0.95, 0.99}; P < .001]). There was no evidence of a difference in AUCs for each parameter (P = .10).
CONCLUSION: Postcontrast myocardium-to-lumen R1 ratio showed excellent diagnostic performance comparable to that of MRI ECV in the detection of cardiac amyloidosis.Keywords: MR Imaging, Cardiac, Heart, Cardiomyopathies Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent MRI-derived extracellular volume fraction (MRI ECV) analysis between March 2017 and July 2021 because of known or suspected heart failure or cardiomyopathy. Pre- and postcontrast T1 maps were generated using the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence. Diagnostic performances of MRI ECV and myocardium-to-lumen R1 ratio on postcontrast T1 maps (a simplified index not requiring a native T1 map and hematocrit level data) for detecting cardiac amyloidosis were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.
RESULTS: Of 352 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 16 [SD]; 235 men), 136 had cardiac amyloidosis. MRI ECV showed 89.0% (121 of 136; 95% CI: 82%, 94%) sensitivity and 98.6% (213 of 216; 95% CI: 96%, 100%) specificity for helping detect cardiac amyloidosis (cutoff value of 40% [AUC, 0.99 {95% CI: 0.97, 1.00}; P < .001]). Postcontrast myocardium-to-lumen R1 ratio showed 92.6% (126 of 136; 95% CI: 89%, 96%) sensitivity and 93.1% (201 of 216; 95% CI: 89%, 96%) specificity (cutoff value of 0.84 [AUC, 0.98 {95% CI: 0.95, 0.99}; P < .001]). There was no evidence of a difference in AUCs for each parameter (P = .10).
CONCLUSION: Postcontrast myocardium-to-lumen R1 ratio showed excellent diagnostic performance comparable to that of MRI ECV in the detection of cardiac amyloidosis.Keywords: MR Imaging, Cardiac, Heart, Cardiomyopathies Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.