MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-804280-9.00008-1

Медицинская библиотека · Handbook of clinical neurology · 2020

Preclinical models of meningioma: Cell culture and animal systems.

Choudhury Abrar, Raleigh David R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor; yet there are no effective systemic or molecular therapies for meningioma patients. One of the primary barriers to understanding meningioma biology and identifying novel therapeutic targets is the lack of tractable preclinical models. While numerous model systems have been created for meningioma, many have fundamental drawbacks. This chapter details the strengths and limitations of existing meningioma models and suggests possible future model systems. Cell culture meningioma models consist of human meningioma cell lines derived from tumor resection specimens, but unfortunately, in vitro systems do not capture the histologic architecture, the tumor microenvironment, or the heterogeneity of meningiomas. Mouse meningioma systems range from genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) to patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and overcome some of the limitations of cultured meningioma cells. However, many in vivo systems have poor reproducibility or fail to recapitulate important aspects of meningioma biology, such as tumor latency. Despite these drawbacks, new discoveries in meningioma biology and advances in the technologies used to develop model systems provide hope that more representative models of meningioma will be developed in the near future.

Для цитирования: Choudhury Abrar, Raleigh David R. Preclinical models of meningioma: Cell culture and animal systems.. Handbook of clinical neurology. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-804280-9.00008-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.