Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2003
Accuracy of mitral valve area measurements using transthoracic rapid freehand 3-dimensional scanning: comparison with noninvasive and invasive methods.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sugeng Lissa, Weinert Lynn, Lammertin Georgeanne, Thomas Patrick, Spencer Kirk T, Decara Jeanne M, Mor-Avi Victor, Huo Dezheng, Feldman Ted, Lang Roberto M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The feasibility and accuracy of direct transthoracic 3-dimensional (3D) mitral valve area (MVA) measurements obtained using freehand scanning was investigated in patients with mitral stenosis.
METHODS: A total of 30 patients (26 women, 4 men; aged 55 +/- 13 years) underwent a 2-dimensional (2D) and Doppler study 1 hour before percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Transthoracic freehand data were acquired using a magnetic receiver attached to a broadband transducer, gated to electrocardiography and respiration. Volumetric MVA measurements from the left ventricle and left atrium were obtained and compared with MVA measurements derived from 2D planimetry, pressure half-time, and proximal isovelocity surface area. Invasive Gorlin MVA measurements were the gold standard for comparison.
RESULTS: In all, 29 patients (97%) had 3D data allowing MVA measurements. Direct 3D measurements from the left ventricle had the least bias (0.06 +/- 0.19 cm(2)) and tightest limits of agreement (-0.44 to 0.32) compared with left atrium measurements (0.17 +/- 0.25 cm(2) and -0.67 to 0.33, respectively). The proximal isovelocity surface area method (bias: 0.09 +/- 0.34 cm(2)) was the most accurate of all 2D methods followed by pressure half-time (0.17 +/- 0.36 cm(2)) and planimetry (0.21 +/- 0.29 cm(2)).
CONCLUSION: Direct 3D MVA measurements from the left ventricle using transthoracic freehand scanning are more accurate than traditional 2D methods.
METHODS: A total of 30 patients (26 women, 4 men; aged 55 +/- 13 years) underwent a 2-dimensional (2D) and Doppler study 1 hour before percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Transthoracic freehand data were acquired using a magnetic receiver attached to a broadband transducer, gated to electrocardiography and respiration. Volumetric MVA measurements from the left ventricle and left atrium were obtained and compared with MVA measurements derived from 2D planimetry, pressure half-time, and proximal isovelocity surface area. Invasive Gorlin MVA measurements were the gold standard for comparison.
RESULTS: In all, 29 patients (97%) had 3D data allowing MVA measurements. Direct 3D measurements from the left ventricle had the least bias (0.06 +/- 0.19 cm(2)) and tightest limits of agreement (-0.44 to 0.32) compared with left atrium measurements (0.17 +/- 0.25 cm(2) and -0.67 to 0.33, respectively). The proximal isovelocity surface area method (bias: 0.09 +/- 0.34 cm(2)) was the most accurate of all 2D methods followed by pressure half-time (0.17 +/- 0.36 cm(2)) and planimetry (0.21 +/- 0.29 cm(2)).
CONCLUSION: Direct 3D MVA measurements from the left ventricle using transthoracic freehand scanning are more accurate than traditional 2D methods.