Revista espanola de cardiologia · 2003
[Hand-held echocardiographic devices: what do they add to the initial cardiovascular evaluation?].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Martín-Peñato Arturo, Zamorano José L, Almería Carlos, Rodrigo José L, Corros Cecilia, Luaces María, Conde Antonio, Vilacosta Isidro, Macaya Carlos
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Hand-held echocardiographic devices have recently become available. Our objective was to determine, on the basis of clinical data and basic diagnostic techniques, whether hand-held devices offer additional information useful not provided by the initial cardiovascular diagnosis.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: We prospectively studied the presence and severity (absent, mild, significative) of 7 frequent heart diseases (aortic or mitral stenosis-regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction-hypertrophy) in 36 consecutive patients (50% men; mean age 68 12 years) with 3 different methods: clinical examination and basic complementary exams, hand-held echocardiography with 2D and color Doppler imaging (OptiGo, Philips Medical Systems, The Netherlands) and a standard, last-generation transthoracic echocardiogram (Sonos 550, Philips Medical Systems, The Netherlands). We compared the results obtained with the first two methods, and combined the results of both to compare these findings against the results obtained with standard electrocardiography. Percentage agreement and Somer's D, a measure of association between ordinal variables, were calculated.
RESULTS: The hand-held device obtained better results than clinical examination (agreement 87 vs. 65%; D = 0.79 0.04 vs. 0.19 0.53) and identified severe lesions that were classified incorrectly by clinical examination in 39% (14/36) patients. However, in 8 patients (10 evaluations) it misclassified severe lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, a hand-held echocardiographic device offers additional information not obtained from an initial cardiovascular diagnosis for common cardiovascular disorders, but it is no substitute for complete echocardiographic examination.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: We prospectively studied the presence and severity (absent, mild, significative) of 7 frequent heart diseases (aortic or mitral stenosis-regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction-hypertrophy) in 36 consecutive patients (50% men; mean age 68 12 years) with 3 different methods: clinical examination and basic complementary exams, hand-held echocardiography with 2D and color Doppler imaging (OptiGo, Philips Medical Systems, The Netherlands) and a standard, last-generation transthoracic echocardiogram (Sonos 550, Philips Medical Systems, The Netherlands). We compared the results obtained with the first two methods, and combined the results of both to compare these findings against the results obtained with standard electrocardiography. Percentage agreement and Somer's D, a measure of association between ordinal variables, were calculated.
RESULTS: The hand-held device obtained better results than clinical examination (agreement 87 vs. 65%; D = 0.79 0.04 vs. 0.19 0.53) and identified severe lesions that were classified incorrectly by clinical examination in 39% (14/36) patients. However, in 8 patients (10 evaluations) it misclassified severe lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, a hand-held echocardiographic device offers additional information not obtained from an initial cardiovascular diagnosis for common cardiovascular disorders, but it is no substitute for complete echocardiographic examination.