MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1176/ps.62.1.pss6201_0090

Медицинская библиотека · Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2011

An approach to evaluating competence in assessing and managing violence risk.

McNiel Dale E, Hung Erick K, Cramer Robert J, Hall Stephen E, Binder Renee L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The authors developed and evaluated a tool for assessing competency in violence risk assessment and management.

METHODS

The Competency Assessment Instrument for Violence Risk (CAI-V) was based on the literature on violence risk assessment, which was complemented by feedback from faculty focus groups. In an objective structured clinical examination, 31 faculty observers used the CAI-V to rate the performance of 31 learners' (26 psychiatry residents and five psychology interns) risk assessments of standardized (simulated) patients. In an interrater reliability study, six faculty members rated video-recorded risk assessments.

RESULTS

The CAI-V had good internal consistency reliability (α=.93). Senior learners performed better on the CAI-V than junior learners, supporting the instrument's concurrent validity. Interrater reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient=.93). Participants reported that the CAI-V provided a helpful structure for feedback and supervision.

CONCLUSIONS

The results supported the potential of this new approach for appraising competency in violence risk assessment and management.

Для цитирования: McNiel Dale E, Hung Erick K, Cramer Robert J, Hall Stephen E, Binder Renee L. An approach to evaluating competence in assessing and managing violence risk.. Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.). 2011. DOI: 10.1176/ps.62.1.pss6201_0090.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.