In-depth Clinical, Hemodynamic, and Volumetric Assessment of the Resection and Partial Liver Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy-Type Auxiliary Liver Transplantation in Noncirrhotic Setting: Are We Simply Dealing With a Transplant Model of Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy?

BACKGROUND

The Resection And Partial Liver Transplantation with Delayed total hepatectomy (RAPID) procedure involves left hepatectomy with orthotopic implantation of a left lobe and right portal vein ligation. This technique induces volumetric graft increase, allowing for a right completion hepatectomy within 15 days. Notably, there is a lack of data on the hemodynamics of small-for-size grafts exposed to portal overflow without triggering small-for-size syndrome.

METHODS

A prospective single-center protocol included 8 living donors and 8 RAPID noncirrhotic recipients. Comprehensive clinical and biological data were collected, accompanied by intraoperative arterial and portal flow and pressure measurements. Early kinetic growth rate (eKGR%) and graft function were assessed using computed tomography and 99Tc-mebrofenin scintigraphy on postoperative days 7 and 14. Findings were compared with retrospective data from 13 left living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients.

RESULTS

The median Graft-body weight ratio was 0.41% (interquartile range: 0.34-0.49), markedly lower than in LDLT. However, there was no significant difference in eKGR between RAPID and LDLT grafts. Sequential analysis revealed variable eKGR per day: 10.6% (7.8-13.2) in the first week and 7.6% (6-9.1) in the second week posttransplantation. Indexed portal flow (indexed portal vein flow) was significantly higher in RAPID compared with left LDLT ( P = 0.01). No hemodynamic parameters were found to correlate with regeneration speed. We modulated portal flow in 2 out of 8 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the first report of hemodynamic and volumetric data for the RAPID technique. Despite initial graft volumes falling below conventional LDLT recommendations, the study highlights acceptable clinical outcomes.