MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3171/2017.10.jns171528

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurosurgery · 2018

Clipping as re-treatment strategy after treatment of a cerebral aneurysm with the Woven EndoBridge embolization device: case report.

Durner Gregor, Özpeynirci Yigit, Schmitz Bernd, Wirtz Christian Rainer, König Ralph, Pala Andrej

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Recently, treatment of cerebral aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has become an established endovascular strategy. However, over time, neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists will be confronted with the challenge of how to treat aneurysm recanalization. The authors report the case of a 49-year-old woman who underwent re-treatment with clipping after the recanalization of a 4 × 3-mm anterior communicating artery aneurysm that had previously been treated using a 4 × 3 WEB device. In contrast to the authors' prior experiences with clipping of previously coiled aneurysms, the WEB device was found to have a responsive softness during clip placement, and the aneurysm was more maneuverable. Moreover, evaluation with indocyanine green angiography was easy to perform because of the transparent mesh of the WEB device. No profound scarring or WEB protrusion was noted during surgery, making the procedure easier and less dangerous with regard to additional complications. The authors suggest that re-treatment via clipping should be considered in select cases of aneurysm recurrence after treatment with an intraaneurysmal flow diverter.

Для цитирования: Durner Gregor, Özpeynirci Yigit, Schmitz Bernd, Wirtz Christian Rainer, König Ralph, Pala Andrej. Clipping as re-treatment strategy after treatment of a cerebral aneurysm with the Woven EndoBridge embolization device: case report.. Journal of neurosurgery. 2018. DOI: 10.3171/2017.10.jns171528.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.