MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.20587-17.2

Медицинская библиотека · Turkish neurosurgery · 2018

Simulated Effects of Perianeurysmal Bone on a Cerebral Aneurysm: A Case Study.

Wang Fuyu, Xue Zhe, Sun Zhenghui, Jiang Jinli, Wu Chen, Xu Bainan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: To use computational models to explore the influence of contact with perianeurysmal bone on an intracranial aneurysm.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A middle cerebral artery aneurysm in contact with an anterior clinoid process was selected. Two anatomic models were constructed from computed tomography angiography images: A non-contact model with elasticity of the entire aneurysm wall and a contact model with rigidity of the part of the aneurysm wall contacting bone. The blood flow pattern, and wall stress and displacement were compared between the two models.

RESULTS

The contact and non-contact models exhibited similar wall shear stress and pressure, but different degrees of von Mises stress and wall displacement. Displacement close to the bone contact part of the aneurysm wall was less in the contact model than in the non-contact model, whereas displacement of the part opposite to the contact part was larger in the contact model than in the non-contact model. Also, von Mises stress close to the contact part was larger in the contact model than in the non-contact model.

CONCLUSION

Contacting perianeurysmal bone affects the deformation and degree of von Mises stress but not the hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms.

Для цитирования: Wang Fuyu, Xue Zhe, Sun Zhenghui, Jiang Jinli, Wu Chen, Xu Bainan. Simulated Effects of Perianeurysmal Bone on a Cerebral Aneurysm: A Case Study.. Turkish neurosurgery. 2018. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.20587-17.2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.