MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2017

Lip Measurements and Preferences in Asians and Hispanics: A Brief Review.

Kollipara Ramya, Walker Bridget, Sturgeon Ashley

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

Most literature regarding lip augmentation refers to Caucasian anthropometric measurements, but ethnic differences affect facial dimensions and the evaluation of beauty. Specifically with regard to Asians and Hispanics, dermatology does not have much literature on the subject. This review investigates the differences in lip measurements and preferences of Asians and Hispanics compared with those of Caucasians.

Design

A literature search of other fields, including plastic surgery, maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, and forensic anthropology, was conducted, and relevant articles were selected that applied to the discussion of lip measurements and preferences in Asians and Hispanics.

Results

Lip measurements do appear to differ between Asians, Hispanics, and Caucasians, and ethnic background appears to influence lip preferences.

Conclusions

It is inappropriate to use Caucasian measurements and generalizations in lip preferences when determining what is "ideal" when aesthetically augmenting lips among Asians and Hispanics. Ultimately, it is important to take into account the goals, anatomy, and ethnic background of each individual patient before performing lip augmentation.

Для цитирования: Kollipara Ramya, Walker Bridget, Sturgeon Ashley. Lip Measurements and Preferences in Asians and Hispanics: A Brief Review.. The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology. 2017.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.