Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024
Detection of residual stones by peroral direct cholangioscopy in patients with intrahepatic stones after hepaticojejunostomy: a prospective study (with video).
СтатьяVideo-Audio MediaНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsumoto Kazuyuki, Kato Hironari, Matsumi Akihiro, Miyamoto Kazuya, Morimoto Kosaku, Fujii Yuki, Sato Ryosuke, Hattori Nao, Obata Taisuke, Terasawa Hiroyuki, Uchida Daisuke, Horiguchi Shigeru, Tsutsumi Koichiro, Otsuka Motoyuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The difficulty in radiographic confirmation of the presence of stones remains challenging in the treatment of intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD) stones in patients after hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). Peroral direct cholangioscopy (PDCS) enables direct observation of the bile duct and is useful for detecting and removing residual stones; however, its effectiveness is not clearly established in this clinical context.
METHODS: This single-center, single-arm, prospective study included 44 patients with IHBD who underwent bowel reconstruction with HJ during the study period. Stone removal was performed by using short-type double-balloon enteroscopy. After balloon-occluded cholangiography, the double-balloon enteroscopy was exchanged for an ultra-slim endoscope through the balloon overtube for PDCS. The primary end point was the rate of residual stones detected by PDCS. Secondary end points were success rate of PDCS, residual stone removal with PDCS, procedure time for PDCS, procedure-related adverse events, and stone recurrence rate.
RESULTS: PDCS was successful in 39 (89%) of 44 patients, among whom residual stones were detected in 16 (41%) (95% CI, 28%-54%). Twelve patients (75%) had residual stones <5 mm. Stone removal was successful in 15 (94%) patients, and median procedure time for PDCS was 16 minutes (interquartile range, 10-26 minutes). The rate of procedure-related adverse events was 7% (3 of 44); all adverse events improved with conservative treatment. During the median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.4-3.3 years), the overall probability of recurrence-free status at 1, 2, and 3 years was 100%, 92%, and 86%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PDCS is a safe and effective procedure for complete stone removal in patients with IHBD stones after HJ.
METHODS: This single-center, single-arm, prospective study included 44 patients with IHBD who underwent bowel reconstruction with HJ during the study period. Stone removal was performed by using short-type double-balloon enteroscopy. After balloon-occluded cholangiography, the double-balloon enteroscopy was exchanged for an ultra-slim endoscope through the balloon overtube for PDCS. The primary end point was the rate of residual stones detected by PDCS. Secondary end points were success rate of PDCS, residual stone removal with PDCS, procedure time for PDCS, procedure-related adverse events, and stone recurrence rate.
RESULTS: PDCS was successful in 39 (89%) of 44 patients, among whom residual stones were detected in 16 (41%) (95% CI, 28%-54%). Twelve patients (75%) had residual stones <5 mm. Stone removal was successful in 15 (94%) patients, and median procedure time for PDCS was 16 minutes (interquartile range, 10-26 minutes). The rate of procedure-related adverse events was 7% (3 of 44); all adverse events improved with conservative treatment. During the median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.4-3.3 years), the overall probability of recurrence-free status at 1, 2, and 3 years was 100%, 92%, and 86%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PDCS is a safe and effective procedure for complete stone removal in patients with IHBD stones after HJ.