Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2025
Endoscopic-Guided Resection of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Giffoni Rodolfo Baptista, Dos Santos Gabriele, Aguiar Ricardo Santos, Lins Lucas Costa, Cruz Marcelo Leandro Santana, Lima Adriano Damasceno
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic-guided versus microscopic endaural and canal wall up approaches in the resection of middle ear cholesteatoma in both adult and pediatric patients.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2024, covering studies published between 2004 and 2024. Cohort and randomized trials addressing middle ear cholesteatoma resection were included. Excluded were studies with unequal disease extent, canal wall down surgeries, other unrelated otological procedures, and nonlongitudinal studies. Screening of studies and assessment of the risk of bias were performed independently by two pairs of blinded authors. Data abstraction adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 1,134 cases from 13 studies were included. In the endoscope group, there was a significant reduction in the risk of residual cholesteatoma (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89). No significant differences were observed between the groups for postoperative tympanic membrane perforation or cartilage graft displacement. Similarly, postoperative complications, such as disturbances in taste sensation and transient vertigo, did not differ significantly between the two approaches.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-guided resection is superior to microscopic surgery in terms of residual cholesteatoma resection, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or tympanic membrane status.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2024, covering studies published between 2004 and 2024. Cohort and randomized trials addressing middle ear cholesteatoma resection were included. Excluded were studies with unequal disease extent, canal wall down surgeries, other unrelated otological procedures, and nonlongitudinal studies. Screening of studies and assessment of the risk of bias were performed independently by two pairs of blinded authors. Data abstraction adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 1,134 cases from 13 studies were included. In the endoscope group, there was a significant reduction in the risk of residual cholesteatoma (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89). No significant differences were observed between the groups for postoperative tympanic membrane perforation or cartilage graft displacement. Similarly, postoperative complications, such as disturbances in taste sensation and transient vertigo, did not differ significantly between the two approaches.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-guided resection is superior to microscopic surgery in terms of residual cholesteatoma resection, with no significant difference in postoperative complications or tympanic membrane status.