Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery · 1998
Direct immunofluorescence diagnosis of pemphigus without biopsy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Feliciani C, Pour S M, Toto P, Coscione G, Amerio P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is a necessary examination tool for the diagnosis of pemphigus. The suction-blister-method splits the skin at the lamina lucida and it is possible with a scalpel to separate the entire epidermis from the dermis.
OBJECTIVE: The study was to determine whether DIF is reliable on epidermal sheets separated using a suction apparatus.
METHODS: Thirteen patients were selected for this study: (nine with pemphigus vulgaris (PV), one with paraneoplastic pemphigus (PP), and three with pemphigus erythematosus (PE). Frozen epidermal sheets, separated from the dermis with a scalpel, were used as a substrate. Diagnosis with routine fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) antibodies was made.
RESULTS: In all patients a pericellular deposition of IgG was evident and in eight of these patients a pericellular deposition of C3 was present. In two cases of PE and one of PP, the C3 deposits were also present in the lower part of basal keratinocytes.
CONCLUSION: This diagnostic method without skin biopsy is easy to perform and, together with the histology and clinical aspects, could be a useful tool in the diagnosis of pemphigus. We recommend this method when the patient is allergic to local anaesthetics, the patient easily produces hypertrophic scars, or in follow-up of already biopsied patients.
OBJECTIVE: The study was to determine whether DIF is reliable on epidermal sheets separated using a suction apparatus.
METHODS: Thirteen patients were selected for this study: (nine with pemphigus vulgaris (PV), one with paraneoplastic pemphigus (PP), and three with pemphigus erythematosus (PE). Frozen epidermal sheets, separated from the dermis with a scalpel, were used as a substrate. Diagnosis with routine fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) antibodies was made.
RESULTS: In all patients a pericellular deposition of IgG was evident and in eight of these patients a pericellular deposition of C3 was present. In two cases of PE and one of PP, the C3 deposits were also present in the lower part of basal keratinocytes.
CONCLUSION: This diagnostic method without skin biopsy is easy to perform and, together with the histology and clinical aspects, could be a useful tool in the diagnosis of pemphigus. We recommend this method when the patient is allergic to local anaesthetics, the patient easily produces hypertrophic scars, or in follow-up of already biopsied patients.