MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/eat.1027

Медицинская библиотека · The International journal of eating disorders · 2001

Changes in cue reactivity following treatment for bulimia nervosa.

Carter F A, Bulik C M, McIntosh V V, Joyce P R

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in cue reactivity following cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) for bulimia nervosa and to evaluate whether changes are associated with treatment modality or treatment outcome.

METHOD: Subjects were 135 women (17-45 years old) with a current, primary diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. They were participants in a randomized clinical trial examining the additive efficacy of exposure and nonexposure-based behavior therapy to a core of CBT. Physiological, self-report, and behavioral measures of cue reactivity to individualized high-risk binge foods were obtained at pretreatment and posttreatment. Primary, secondary, and tertiary outcome measures are reported for posttreatment.

RESULTS

Bulimic patients experienced significant changes in cue reactivity following treatment. With the exception of salivary reactivity, patients experienced less reactivity at posttreatment. Changes in cue reactivity were not related to treatment modality, but were related to positive treatment outcome for self-report measures of cue reactivity.

DISCUSSION: Favorable treatment outcome among bulimic women is associated with low cue reactivity on self-report measures at posttreatment.

Для цитирования: Carter F A, Bulik C M, McIntosh V V, Joyce P R. Changes in cue reactivity following treatment for bulimia nervosa.. The International journal of eating disorders. 2001. DOI: 10.1002/eat.1027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.