MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1586/erc.10.66

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2010

Comparison of rhythm restoration strategies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Shah Ashok J, Haissaguerre Michel, Hocini Meleze, Jais Pierre

КомментарийСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Evaluation of: Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P et al.; ThermoCool AF Trial Investigators. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 303(4), 333-340 (2010). Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is responsible for the highest number of cardioembolic strokes worldwide. Discovery of the role of pulmonary veins as a trigger has been an important breakthrough that has led to the development of catheter ablation, an established curative therapy for drug-resistant atrial fibrillation. In a systematically conducted prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing pulmonary vein isolation-based catheter ablation with pharmacological rhythm control, the currently recommended first-line therapy in atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, proved superior to antiarrhythmic drugs with regards to the maintenance of sinus rhythm and improvement in symptoms and quality of life at 1 year of follow-up, with comparable adverse event rates. Early use of catheter ablation in selected patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation unresponsive to one antiarrhythmic drug is promising.

Для цитирования: Shah Ashok J, Haissaguerre Michel, Hocini Meleze, Jais Pierre. Comparison of rhythm restoration strategies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2010. DOI: 10.1586/erc.10.66.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.