European journal of radiology · 2010
Evaluation of left atrial function by multidetector computed tomography before left atrial radiofrequency-catheter ablation: comparison of a manual and automated 3D volume segmentation method.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wolf Florian, Ourednicek Petr, Loewe Christian, Richter Bernhard, Gössinger Heinz David, Gwechenberger Marianne, Plank Christina, Schernthaner Rüdiger Egbert, Toepker Michael, Lammer Johannes, Feuchtner Gudrun M
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare a manual and automated 3D volume segmentation tool for evaluation of left atrial (LA) function by 64-slice multidetector-CT (MDCT).
METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 33 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation a MDCT scan was performed before radiofrequency-catheter ablation. Atrial function (minimal volume (LAmin), maximal volume (LAmax), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF)) was evaluated by two readers using a manual and an automatic tool and measurement time was evaluated.
RESULTS: Automated LA volume segmentation failed in one patient due to low LA enhancement (103HU). Mean LAmax, LAmin, SV and EF were 127.7 ml, 93 ml, 34.7 ml, 27.1% by the automated, and 122.7 ml, 89.9 ml, 32.8 ml, 26.3% by the manual method with no significant difference (p>0.05) and high Pearsons correlation coefficients (r=0.94, r=0.94, r=0.82 and r=0.85, p<0.0001), respectively. The automated method was significantly faster (p<0.001). Interobserver variability was low for both methods with Pearson's correlation coefficients between 0.98 and 0.99 (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of LA volume and function with 64-slice MDCT is feasible with a very low interobserver variability. The automatic method is as accurate as the manual method but significantly less time consuming permitting a routine use in clinical practice before RF-catheter ablation.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 33 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation a MDCT scan was performed before radiofrequency-catheter ablation. Atrial function (minimal volume (LAmin), maximal volume (LAmax), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF)) was evaluated by two readers using a manual and an automatic tool and measurement time was evaluated.
RESULTS: Automated LA volume segmentation failed in one patient due to low LA enhancement (103HU). Mean LAmax, LAmin, SV and EF were 127.7 ml, 93 ml, 34.7 ml, 27.1% by the automated, and 122.7 ml, 89.9 ml, 32.8 ml, 26.3% by the manual method with no significant difference (p>0.05) and high Pearsons correlation coefficients (r=0.94, r=0.94, r=0.82 and r=0.85, p<0.0001), respectively. The automated method was significantly faster (p<0.001). Interobserver variability was low for both methods with Pearson's correlation coefficients between 0.98 and 0.99 (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of LA volume and function with 64-slice MDCT is feasible with a very low interobserver variability. The automatic method is as accurate as the manual method but significantly less time consuming permitting a routine use in clinical practice before RF-catheter ablation.