Heart rhythm · 2009
Electrical resynchronization induced by direct His-bundle pacing.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lustgarten Daniel L, Calame Susan, Crespo Eric M, Calame James, Lobel Robert, Spector Peter S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing (BiV) to effect cardiac resynchronization therapy can be technically difficult and fails to elicit a clinical response in 30% to 40% of patients. Direct His-bundle pacing (DHBP) theoretically could obviate some of these problems. Although DHBP is capable of narrowing the QRS in some patients, the consistency with which this can be achieved has not been characterized.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to restore His-Purkinje functionality in consecutive patients undergoing de novo clinically mandated cardiac resynchronization therapy.
METHODS: DHBP was temporarily implemented at the time of implantation of a permanent BiV system in patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Native conduction, DHBP, and BiV QRS duration were compared. All patients presenting for BiV cardiac resynchronization therapy were eligible for the study. Ten patients were studied.
RESULTS: DHBP was successfully implemented in all 10 patients. In 7 of 10 patients, DHBP narrowed the QRS significantly compared with native conduction and BiV (mean QRS duration: native 171 +/- 13 ms, DHBP 148 +/- 11 ms, BiV 158 +/- 21, P <.0001). QRS narrowing with DHBP was specifically attributable to capture of latent His-Purkinje tissue. DHBP lead implantation time (16 minutes) was shorter than standard left ventricular lead implantation time (42 minutes).
CONCLUSION: DHBP was readily implemented in patients with standard indications for BiV cardiac resynchronization therapy. In most patients studied, DHBP resulted in a significantly narrower QRS compared with native conduction. DHBP may offer a physiologic alternative to BiV for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to restore His-Purkinje functionality in consecutive patients undergoing de novo clinically mandated cardiac resynchronization therapy.
METHODS: DHBP was temporarily implemented at the time of implantation of a permanent BiV system in patients referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Native conduction, DHBP, and BiV QRS duration were compared. All patients presenting for BiV cardiac resynchronization therapy were eligible for the study. Ten patients were studied.
RESULTS: DHBP was successfully implemented in all 10 patients. In 7 of 10 patients, DHBP narrowed the QRS significantly compared with native conduction and BiV (mean QRS duration: native 171 +/- 13 ms, DHBP 148 +/- 11 ms, BiV 158 +/- 21, P <.0001). QRS narrowing with DHBP was specifically attributable to capture of latent His-Purkinje tissue. DHBP lead implantation time (16 minutes) was shorter than standard left ventricular lead implantation time (42 minutes).
CONCLUSION: DHBP was readily implemented in patients with standard indications for BiV cardiac resynchronization therapy. In most patients studied, DHBP resulted in a significantly narrower QRS compared with native conduction. DHBP may offer a physiologic alternative to BiV for cardiac resynchronization therapy.