Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026
Minimally invasive surgery for diverticulitis: a single-center retrospective study in the United States focusing on splenic flexure mobilization in elective sigmoid colectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Doyle William N, Alden Ashley J, Rodriguez-Silva Jetsen A, Kim Jin, Poonja Sharan, Kendall Melissa A, Smith Kaylee, Martinez Carolina, Chudzinski Allen, Moudgill Lisa, Cavallaro Paul, Marcet Jorge E, Bennett Robert D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) is occasionally utilized during sigmoidectomy to facilitate a tension-free colorectal anastomosis. Present literature regarding its use, safety, and efficacy predominantly evaluates traditional laparoscopic vs. open techniques, thus not adequately representing the current minimally invasive surgical landscape.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated SFM during sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease via traditional laparoscopic, single-incision laparoscopic, and robotic techniques at a United States academic institution from 2019 to 2022. Primary outcomes were the rate of SFM, independent predictors, and short-term outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 117 patients underwent sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis by six colorectal surgeons, of whom 27 underwent SFM. SFM was associated with higher rates of complicated diverticulitis (85.2% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001), including abscess (55.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.037) and fistulae (59.3% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.001). Presence of a fistula was an independent predictor of SFM by logistic regression (odds ratio [OR], 5.886; p < 0.001). Mobilization was associated with more concomitant surgical procedures (66.7% vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001). There was a significant association between SFM and conversion to open approach (14.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.049), longer length of stay (4.2 ± 2.8 days vs. 3.6 ± 4.3 days, p = 0.041), and increased operative time (241.7 ± 76.4 minutes vs. 199.2 ± 75.7 minutes). There was no difference in 30-day morbidity/mortality.
CONCLUSION: Routine SFM can be considered in minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for complicated diverticulitis without significant impact on 30-day morbidity/mortality regardless of surgical approach and may be anticipated preoperatively, particularly when a fistula is present.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated SFM during sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease via traditional laparoscopic, single-incision laparoscopic, and robotic techniques at a United States academic institution from 2019 to 2022. Primary outcomes were the rate of SFM, independent predictors, and short-term outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 117 patients underwent sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis by six colorectal surgeons, of whom 27 underwent SFM. SFM was associated with higher rates of complicated diverticulitis (85.2% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001), including abscess (55.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.037) and fistulae (59.3% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.001). Presence of a fistula was an independent predictor of SFM by logistic regression (odds ratio [OR], 5.886; p < 0.001). Mobilization was associated with more concomitant surgical procedures (66.7% vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001). There was a significant association between SFM and conversion to open approach (14.8% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.049), longer length of stay (4.2 ± 2.8 days vs. 3.6 ± 4.3 days, p = 0.041), and increased operative time (241.7 ± 76.4 minutes vs. 199.2 ± 75.7 minutes). There was no difference in 30-day morbidity/mortality.
CONCLUSION: Routine SFM can be considered in minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for complicated diverticulitis without significant impact on 30-day morbidity/mortality regardless of surgical approach and may be anticipated preoperatively, particularly when a fistula is present.