MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380060043011

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 1980

Treatment of surgical emergencies with and without an algorithm.

Hopkins J A, Shoemaker W C, Greenfield S, Chang P C, McAuliffe T, Sproat R W

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A patient care algorithm was developed for resuscitation of patients entering the surgical emergency department with hypotension. The diagnostic workup, monitoring, and therapy were progressively excalated according to admission blood pressure and responses to therapeutic interventions. The branching-chain logic is ideally suited for rapid decision making in emergency conditions where the need is most urgent, the time constraints are most severe, and the potential improvements in terms of patient salvage are greatest. Preliminary results from these ongoing clinical trials indicate that (1) physicians can and will use an algorithm for emergency medical service resuscitation; (2) in a university hospital with a large emergency service and a commitment to emergency care, the physicians using the aigorithm performed as well as and in some instances better than those not using the algorithm; and (3) the use of the algorithm may prevent delays in resuscitation and lead to less morbidity and mortality. Thus, we conclude that the algorithm helps to organize emergency care, establish standards, and improve care.

Для цитирования: Hopkins J A, Shoemaker W C, Greenfield S, Chang P C, McAuliffe T, Sproat R W. Treatment of surgical emergencies with and without an algorithm.. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1980. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380060043011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.