MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/30502225251378180

Медицинская библиотека · Sage open pediatrics · 2025

Assessing Caregiver Satisfaction and Preferences in Pediatric Radiology: A Study on Communication and Safety Concerns.

Al-Ali Khaled, AlHabil Yazan, Giacaman Yazan, Shakhshir Ali, Hamaida Jihad, Taha Sari, Zyoud Sa'ed H

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the satisfaction and preferences of caregivers regarding communication about radiological safety.

METHODS

Data were collected in major Palestinian hospitals via a questionnaire that explored participants' satisfaction with the information provided and the quality of communication by referring physicians.

RESULTS

The final sample consisted of 282 caregivers. Most caregivers demonstrated high satisfaction with the adequacy of information regarding the indication for radiological testing (92.2%), but they were not satisfied with the information about radiation dose (56.8%). The majority were satisfied with the mutual discussions (90.8%), previous radiological tests (62.6%), and radiological information about the indicated examination (76.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of communication was inadequate. While most caregivers preferred receiving verbal and written information from providers, some preferred other sources of information, such as digital media. Interventions should use educational courses and develop policies to address communication problems regarding radiological safety.

Для цитирования: Al-Ali Khaled, AlHabil Yazan, Giacaman Yazan, Shakhshir Ali, Hamaida Jihad, Taha Sari, Zyoud Sa'ed H. Assessing Caregiver Satisfaction and Preferences in Pediatric Radiology: A Study on Communication and Safety Concerns.. Sage open pediatrics. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/30502225251378180.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.