DOI 10.1186/s12880-025-01928-2
Automated deep learning method for whole-breast segmentation in contrast-free quantitative MRI.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
To develop a deep learning segmentation method utilizing the nnU-Net architecture for fully automated whole-breast segmentation based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and synthetic MRI (SyMRI) images.
METHODS
A total of 98 patients with 196 breasts were evaluated. All patients underwent 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) examinations, which incorporated DWI and SyMRI techniques. The ground truth for breast segmentation was established through a manual, slice-by-slice approach performed by two experienced radiologists. The U-Net and nnU-Net deep learning algorithms were employed to segment the whole-breast. Performance was evaluated using various metrics, including the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), accuracy, and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
RESULTS
For DWI and proton density (PD) of SyMRI, the nnU-Net outperformed the U-Net achieving the higher DSC in both the testing set (DWI, 0.930 ± 0.029 vs. 0.785 ± 0.161; PD, 0.969 ± 0.010 vs. 0.936 ± 0.018) and independent testing set (DWI, 0.953 ± 0.019 vs. 0.789 ± 0.148; PD, 0.976 ± 0.008 vs. 0.939 ± 0.018). The PD of SyMRI exhibited better performance than DWI, attaining the highest DSC and accuracy. The correlation coefficients R² for nnU-Net were 0.99 ~ 1.00 for DWI and PD, significantly surpassing the performance of U-Net.
CONCLUSION
The nnU-Net exhibited exceptional segmentation performance for fully automated breast segmentation of contrast-free quantitative images. This method serves as an effective tool for processing large-scale clinical datasets and represents a significant advancement toward computer-aided quantitative analysis of breast DWI and SyMRI images.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.