MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.6061/clinics/2016(08)04

Медицинская библиотека · Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2016

The Internet versus pediatricians as a source of infant teething information for parents in Turkey.

Haznedaroglu Eda, Mentes Ali

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Parents are increasingly searching the Internet to gather information about their children's health care. This study compared infant teething information obtained from publically employed pediatricians in Istanbul with that obtained from different Turkish websites (parenting, health, professional, news and commercial).

METHODS

This study had two parts. The first part used a descriptive design, with two checklists to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of the teething-specific content on 62 parenting or health websites. The second part was a cross-sectional study of 75 pediatricians at public hospitals who completed a structured self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

In total, 54 websites (87.1%) described infant teething as a normal developmental process. The lists that were found on the websites identified the most frequent signs of infant teething as fever and drooling/perioral rash. The most frequent management strategies were chewing non-chilled and chilled objects. For teething problems, some pediatricians recommended teething rings and oral benzocaine, while 23 pediatricians recommended nothing.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents should be informed by health professionals, especially regarding specific treatment strategies.

Для цитирования: Haznedaroglu Eda, Mentes Ali. The Internet versus pediatricians as a source of infant teething information for parents in Turkey.. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2016. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2016(08)04.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.