MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.12.002

Медицинская библиотека · Applied nursing research : ANR · 2013

Intermittent urethral catheterization-descriptive study at a Brazilian service.

Mazzo Alessandra, Souza-Junior Valtuir D, Jorge Beatriz M, Nassif Aline, Biaziolo Cintia F B, Cassini Marcelo F, Santos Raquel C R, Mendes Isabel Amélia Costa

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS AND

BACKGROUND

The rehabilitation process of patients with neurogenic bladder involves psychosocial, cultural, political and economic human factors, representing a challenge for patients/caregivers as well as health professionals. This study was aimed at characterizing patients with neurogenic bladder who use intermittent urethral catheterization and were going through rehabilitation at a teaching hospital.

METHOD: This descriptive study was undertaken in the interior of São Paulo State-Brazil. All ethical guidelines were complied with. To collect the data, interviews were held during nursing consultations with patients more than 18years of age suffering from neurogenic bladder who used intermittent urethral catheterization.

RESULTS

Most patients had spinal cord trauma, are single, male and gain a low income. They have been using catheterization for several years, at irregular frequencies, using polyethylene catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

No standardization exists in the accomplishment of the practices used and strategies are needed to remodel the service.

Для цитирования: Mazzo Alessandra, Souza-Junior Valtuir D, Jorge Beatriz M, Nassif Aline, Biaziolo Cintia F B, Cassini Marcelo F, Santos Raquel C R, Mendes Isabel Amélia Costa. Intermittent urethral catheterization-descriptive study at a Brazilian service.. Applied nursing research : ANR. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.12.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.