MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1749078

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in psychology · 2026

Neural correlates of affective self-positivity bias in first and second languages.

Kong Chao, Liu Huanhuan, Schwieter John W, Muñoz Francisco

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

An inherent positive bias emerges when individuals perceive themselves compared to when they perceive others. However, for bilinguals, it has been suggested that this self-positivity bias may be sensitive to the language in which information is presented.

METHODS

In this study, we examine this hypothesis among a group of Chinese-English bilinguals who performed a lexical decision task in their first (L1, Chinese) and second (L2, English) language. During the experiment, brain activity was recorded using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).

RESULTS

Results showed faster responses and decreased activity in the right medial frontal gyrus (RMFG) for self-positivity compared to other-positivity conditions in the L2 context. However, this identified self-positivity bias in the L2 elicited less engagement of the RMFG than that in the L1.

DISCUSSION: These findings reveal distinct mechanisms across languages that underpin the self-positivity bias. Self-positivity bias is processed more embodied in an L1, drawing on richer emotional associations, whereas self-positivity bias is processed in a disembodied way in an L2, which requires integration of affective and lexical information.

Для цитирования: Kong Chao, Liu Huanhuan, Schwieter John W, Muñoz Francisco. Neural correlates of affective self-positivity bias in first and second languages.. Frontiers in psychology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1749078.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.