MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00277-018-3516-1

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of hematology · 2018

Validation of the Marginal Zone Lymphoma International Prognostic Index.

Hong Joohyun, Cho Junhun, Ko Young Hye, Kim Seok Jin, Kim Won Seog

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The Marginal Zone Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MALT-IPI) was recently developed for use in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma based on age, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and Ann Arbor stage. In this study, we aimed to validate the MALT-IPI. A total of 455 MALT lymphoma patients were included in this study from between January 2005 and February 2017. Event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were the primary outcomes. Of the 455 patients, MALT-IPI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups included 309 (67.9%), 126 (27.7%), and 20 (4.4%) individuals, respectively. When comparing the low-risk group (L MALT-IPI) with the intermediate-high-risk group (I-H MALT-IPI), EFS, PFS, CSS, and OS were significantly different (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, p = 0.027, and p = 0.037). The International Prognostic Index and the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index failed to predict the prognosis of MALT lymphoma. Use of the MALT-IPI significantly differentiated L MALT-IPI from I-H MALT-IPI with respect to EFS, PFS, CSS, and OS. MALT-IPI is a valuable tool for the prediction of MALT lymphoma prognosis.

Для цитирования: Hong Joohyun, Cho Junhun, Ko Young Hye, Kim Seok Jin, Kim Won Seog. Validation of the Marginal Zone Lymphoma International Prognostic Index.. Annals of hematology. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-018-3516-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.