MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/bju.12003

Медицинская библиотека · BJU international · 2013

A 9-year experience of renal injury at an Australian level 1 trauma centre.

Shoobridge Jennifer J, Bultitude Matthew F, Koukounaras Jim, Martin Katherine E, Royce Peter L, Corcoran Niall M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To detail the 9-year experience of renal trauma at a modern Level 1 trauma centre and report on patterns of injury, management and complications.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We analysed 338 patients with renal injuries who presented to our institution over a 9-year period. Data on demographics, clinical presentation, management and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Males comprised 74.9% of patients with renal injuries and the highest incidence was amongst those aged 20-24 years. Blunt injuries comprised 96.2% (n = 325) of all the renal injuries, with road trauma being the predominant mechanism accounting for 72.5% of injuries. The distribution of injury grade was; 21.6% grade 1 (n = 73), 24.3% grade 2 (n = 82), 24.9% grade 3 (n = 84), 16.6% grade 4 (n = 56), and 12.7% grade 5 (n = 43). Conservative management was successful in all grade 1 and 2 renal injuries, and 94.9%, 90.7% and 35.1% of grade 3, 4 and 5 injuries respectively. All but one of the 13 patients with penetrating injuries were successfully managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Road trauma is the greatest cause of renal injury. Most haemodynamically stable patients are successfully managed conservatively.

Для цитирования: Shoobridge Jennifer J, Bultitude Matthew F, Koukounaras Jim, Martin Katherine E, Royce Peter L, Corcoran Niall M. A 9-year experience of renal injury at an Australian level 1 trauma centre.. BJU international. 2013. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.