Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) · 2012
Antegrade interlocking nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kulkarni Sunil G, Varshneya Ankit, Jain Mohit, Kulkarni Vidhisha S, Kulkarni Govind S, Kulkarni Milind G, Kulkarni Ruta M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare antegrade interlocking nailing with dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures in terms of functional outcomes, union and complication rates.
METHODS: 34 men and 22 women aged >18 years with fresh humeral shaft fractures (up to grade IIIa) with or without neurological deficits underwent either antegrade interlocking nailing (n=31) or dynamic compression plating (n=25). Functional outcome of the upper limbs (according to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score), pain, rates of union, and complications in the 2 groups were compared.
RESULTS: Respectively in the nailing and plating groups, mean operating times were 65 and 112 minutes (p<0.001), mean blood loss volumes were 20 and 232 ml (p<0.001), mean ASES scores were 31.4 and 29.0 (p=0.448), complication rates were 20% (6/31) and 24% (6/25) [p=0.900], non-union rates were 13% (4/31) and 8% (2/25) [p=0.625], and delayed union rates were 7% (2/31) and 4% (1/25) [p=0.787].
CONCLUSION: Both techniques were appropriate for treating humeral shaft fractures.
METHODS: 34 men and 22 women aged >18 years with fresh humeral shaft fractures (up to grade IIIa) with or without neurological deficits underwent either antegrade interlocking nailing (n=31) or dynamic compression plating (n=25). Functional outcome of the upper limbs (according to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score), pain, rates of union, and complications in the 2 groups were compared.
RESULTS: Respectively in the nailing and plating groups, mean operating times were 65 and 112 minutes (p<0.001), mean blood loss volumes were 20 and 232 ml (p<0.001), mean ASES scores were 31.4 and 29.0 (p=0.448), complication rates were 20% (6/31) and 24% (6/25) [p=0.900], non-union rates were 13% (4/31) and 8% (2/25) [p=0.625], and delayed union rates were 7% (2/31) and 4% (1/25) [p=0.787].
CONCLUSION: Both techniques were appropriate for treating humeral shaft fractures.