MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1586/14787210.2015.1025056

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2015

Clinical and in vitro evidence for the antimicrobial therapy in Burkholderia cepacia complex infections.

Gautam Vikas, Shafiq Nusrat, Singh Meenu, Ray Pallab, Singhal Lipika, Jaiswal Nishant P, Prasad Amber, Singh Shaunik, Agarwal Amit

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Treatment of infections caused by Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients poses a complex problem. Bcc is multidrug-resistant due to innate and acquired mechanisms of resistance. As CF patients receive multiple courses of antibiotics, susceptibility patterns of strains from CF patients may differ from those noted in strains from non-CF patients. Thus, there was a need for assessing in vitro and clinical data to guide antimicrobial therapy in these patients. A systematic search of literature, followed by extraction and analysis of available information from human and in vitro studies was done. The results of the analysis are used to address various aspects like use of antimicrobials for pulmonary and non-pulmonary infections, use of combination versus monotherapy, early eradication, duration of therapy, route of administration, management of biofilms, development of resistance during therapy, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics correlations, therapy in post-transplant patients and newer drugs in Bcc-infected CF patients.

Для цитирования: Gautam Vikas, Shafiq Nusrat, Singh Meenu, Ray Pallab, Singhal Lipika, Jaiswal Nishant P, Prasad Amber, Singh Shaunik, Agarwal Amit. Clinical and in vitro evidence for the antimicrobial therapy in Burkholderia cepacia complex infections.. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1586/14787210.2015.1025056.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.