MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000519657

Медицинская библиотека · Case reports in dermatology · 2021

The Review of the Difference between Patients and Physicians in Terms of Severity Assessment and Therapeutic Goals in Androgenetic Alopecia in Japan.

Harada Yuya, Niiyama Shiro, Fukuda Hidetsugu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We often come across differences in the severity of androgenetic alopecia (AGA) as assessed subjectively by the patients themselves and objectively by the attending physicians. For the purpose of examining the differences in the assessment of AGA between patients and physicians, we presented the Norwood classification to male patients and the Shiseido classification to female patients and asked them to assess the degree of hair loss by themselves. We compared the results with the severity as assessed by 2 specified dermatologists. The results show that the assessments of the severity of AGA were consistent between the patients and physicians in 42% (15/36) of cases, the physicians reported a higher grade of severity than the patients themselves in 30% (11/36) of cases, and the patients reported a higher grade of severity than the physicians in 28% (10/36) of cases; however, the Wilcoxon signed rank statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the patients and physicians assessments. AGA should be treated in accordance with individual symptoms and wishes and not a standardized treatment protocol.

Для цитирования: Harada Yuya, Niiyama Shiro, Fukuda Hidetsugu. The Review of the Difference between Patients and Physicians in Terms of Severity Assessment and Therapeutic Goals in Androgenetic Alopecia in Japan.. Case reports in dermatology. 2021. DOI: 10.1159/000519657.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.