MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0269215519842254

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical rehabilitation · 2019

The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in Multiple Sclerosis: a multicentre randomized trial.

Renfrew Linda Miller, Paul Lorna, McFadyen Angus, Rafferty Danny, Moseley Owen, Lord Anna C, Bowers Roy, Mattison Paul

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) over 12 months in people with Multiple Sclerosis with foot drop.

DESIGN

Multicentre, powered, non-blinded, randomized trial.

SETTING

Seven Multiple Sclerosis outpatient centres across Scotland.

SUBJECTS: Eighty-five treatment-naïve people with Multiple Sclerosis with persistent (>three months) foot drop.

INTERVENTIONS: Participants randomized to receive a custom-made, AFO (n = 43) or FES device (n = 42).

OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessed at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months; 5-minute self-selected walk test (primary), Timed 25 Foot Walk, oxygen cost of walking, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Euroqol five-dimension five-level questionnaire, Activities-specific Balance and Confidence Scale, Psychological Impact of Assistive Devices Score, and equipment and National Health Service staff time costs of interventions.

RESULTS

Groups were similar for age (AFO, 51.4 (11.2); FES, 50.4(10.4) years) and baseline walking speed (AFO, 0.62 (0.21); FES 0.73 (0.27) m/s). In all, 38% dropped out by 12 months (AFO, n = 21; FES, n = 11). Both groups walked faster at 12 months with device (P < 0.001; AFO, 0.73 (0.24); FES, 0.79 (0.24) m/s) but no difference between groups. Significantly higher Psychological Impact of Assistive Devices Scores were found for FES for Competence (P = 0.016; AFO, 0.85(1.05); FES, 1.53(1.05)), Adaptability (P = 0.001; AFO, 0.38(0.97); FES 1.53 (0.98)) and Self-Esteem (P = 0.006; AFO, 0.45 (0.67); FES 1 (0.68)). Effects were comparable for other measures. FES may offer value for money alternative to usual care.

CONCLUSION

AFOs and FES have comparable effects on walking performance and patient-reported outcomes; however, high drop-outs introduces uncertainty.

Для цитирования: Renfrew Linda Miller, Paul Lorna, McFadyen Angus, Rafferty Danny, Moseley Owen, Lord Anna C, Bowers Roy, Mattison Paul. The clinical- and cost-effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses for foot drop in Multiple Sclerosis: a multicentre randomized trial.. Clinical rehabilitation. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0269215519842254.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.