MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39067-9

Медицинская библиотека · Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2013

A risk analysis of cancer care in Norway: the top 16 patient safety hazards.

Hannisdal Einar, Arianson Helga, Braut Geir Sverre, Schlichting Ellen, Vinnem Jan Erik

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cancer care processes represents a number of potential threats to patient safety. A national risk analysis of Norwegian cancer care, entailing diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, palliative care, and terminal care, was conducted.

METHODS

Literature review and a retrospective analysis of hazards in different national databases were combined with interviews with key health personnel in an attempt to identify 50 possible hazards. A project team from the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision (NBHS) and 23 other persons participated in the workshop in 2009.

RESULTS

In a stepwise, consensus-driven process, the 23 participants discussed the 50 possible hazards and then selected the 16 that they considered most important-clustered into three groups: diagnosis and primary treatment, interactions, and complications. The NBHS distributed the risk analysis report to a variety of stakeholders and asked Norway's hospital trusts to address the hazards. The report generally met a positive reception, albeit with local and interdisciplinary differences in the extent of the perceived applicability of the respective hazards. Two follow-up studies in 2012 and 2013 showed that the hospital trusts lacked the implementation capacity to identify operational solutions to reduce the hazards. At the largest hospital trust in Norway-Oslo University Hospital-the Department of Oncology retested the national risk analysis in in 2011. Four groups, representing different parts of the patient care process. selected 9 of the 16 national hazards and identified 4 new ones. The department has established goals and appropriate activities for 3 of the hazards.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ministry of Health and Care determined that hospital trusts must increase their implementation capacity regarding operational solutions to reduce the hazards.

Для цитирования: Hannisdal Einar, Arianson Helga, Braut Geir Sverre, Schlichting Ellen, Vinnem Jan Erik. A risk analysis of cancer care in Norway: the top 16 patient safety hazards.. Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39067-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.