MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12995-025-00462-9

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2025

SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by non-healthcare occupations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gabriel Katharina M A, Schröder Christin, Wolf Rebecca, Bolm-Audorff Ulrich, Kienast Camilla, Smolinska Joanna, Petereit-Haack Gabriela, Seidler Andreas

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, several industries were deemed essential. However, information on infection risk in occupational settings outside of healthcare workers and medical staff (HCWs) remain scarce. Thus, a systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to compile the risk of infection to SARS-CoV-2 in non-healthcare workers (non-HCWs).

METHODS

We screened three databases (EMBASE, PubMed, medRχiv) for studies on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in working population. Several stages of severity (infection, hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), mortality) were eligible. Occupational specifications were harmonised according to the German classification of professions (KldB). All reported risk estimators were considered. Studies were analysed for their risk of bias. Results of random-effects meta-analyses were assessed for their evidence according to GRADE. Subgroup analyses were run for 'outcome', 'comparison group', and 'risk of bias'.

RESULTS

Of 9,081 publications identified, 25 were recognised as eligible, mainly describing the first year of the pandemic. For 20 occupations, we were able to carry out meta-analyses on KldB-4-level by integrating all stages of severity. Nine occupations were identified with a statistically significantly increased risk of infection for SARS-CoV-2, four of which had a relative risk (RR) of > 2: Occupations in meat processing (RR = 3.58 [95%-CI 1.46; 8.77]), occupations in building cleaning services (RR = 2.55 [95%-CI 1.51; 4.31]), occupations in cargo handling (RR = 2.52 [95%-CI 2.27; 2.79]) and cooks (RR = 2.53 [95%-CI 1.75; 3.67]). The certainty of evidence of eight results was found moderate or high.

CONCLUSIONS

The first systematic review and meta-analysis of occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in occupations other than HCWs revealed a considerably elevated risk in individual related services as well as in commercial services.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021297572.

Для цитирования: Gabriel Katharina M A, Schröder Christin, Wolf Rebecca, Bolm-Audorff Ulrich, Kienast Camilla, Smolinska Joanna, Petereit-Haack Gabriela, Seidler Andreas. SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by non-healthcare occupations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England). 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12995-025-00462-9.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.