Patterns of cortical atrophy are associated with specific cognitive domains in patients with logopenic primary progressive aphasia.
Аннотация
BackgroundLogopenic primary progressive aphasia (LPA) is often associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, few studies have compared cortical atrophy patterns in LPA and AD and their association with cognitive performance.ObjectiveTo identify atrophy patterns specific to LPA and determine whether those patterns relate to deficits in specific cognitive domains.MethodsElectronic health records from 2014-2024 were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with LPA who had undergone MRI and neuropsychological (NP) examinations. Patients with LPA (n = 26) were matched in terms of age, sex, education, and symptom duration to patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI; n = 13). Logistic regression was used to assess group differences in MRI measures of cortical volume and thickness. Cluster analysis was used to identify patterns of atrophy that were associated with specific cognitive domains.ResultsThe LPA group performed significantly worse than the aMCI group on NP measures assessing verbal learning, attention/working memory, language, and executive functioning (p < 0.05). Compared to the aMCI group, the LPA group demonstrated both smaller and thinner cortex in the left lateral aspect of the superior temporal gyrus, superior temporal sulcus, and fusiform gyrus (p < 0.05), with the left superior temporal sulcus providing the most accurate measure of discrimination. Severity of language related cognitive deficits was not associated with a specific cluster in the LPA group.ConclusionsPatients with LPA demonstrate specific patterns of cortical atrophy that are distinguishable from atrophy due to aMCI and may be useful for diagnostic purposes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.