MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association · 2015

Clinical Outcomes of a Team Approach to Thyroidectomy.

Terrell Andrew, Gardner Philip, Spanos W Chad, Allard Brandon, Barth Richard, Bhatia Vishal, Lee John

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the rates of thyroidectomy complications performed by two attending surgeons operating together.

STUDY

DESIGN

This is a retrospective chart review.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review from September 2008 through October 2013 of thyroidectomy cases performed by the head and neck team at Sanford Health. The primary intervention was the presence of two head and neck attendings during each procedure. Outcomes assessed include rates of temporary and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, and of permanent hypocalcemia.

RESULTS

There were 282 patients that underwent a thyroid procedure with a total of 449 at-risk nerves. There were five (1.1 percent) cases of transient vocal cord paresis. There was one case (0.22 percent) of permanent vocal cord paresis after planned nerve resection in a patient with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. There were no other cases of permanent vocal cord paresis. Of 156 total thyroidectomy cases, there was one case of chronic hypocalcemia (0.64 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

A two-surgeon approach to thyroidectomy produces excellent functional outcomes. Further investigation into cost-effectiveness is warranted.

Для цитирования: Terrell Andrew, Gardner Philip, Spanos W Chad, Allard Brandon, Barth Richard, Bhatia Vishal, Lee John. Clinical Outcomes of a Team Approach to Thyroidectomy.. South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association. 2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.