DOI 10.5152/anatoljcardiol.2022.1322
Relationship Between Fragmented QRS Complex and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcome in Patients with Essential Hypertension.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
In patients with essential hypertension, fragmented QRS has been asso- ciated with many remodeling components that might lead to adverse cardiovascular effects. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between fragmented QRS and adverse events and its potential long-term prognostic value.
METHODS
The patients with essential hypertension were divided into two groups accord- ing to the presence of fragmented QRS: fragmented QRS (+) and fragmented QRS (-). During long-term follow-up, the relationship of fragmented QRS to coronary artery dis- ease, congestive heart failure, stroke, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and majoradverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was evaluated.
RESULTS
The study group included 542 patients with essential hypertension. Fragmented QRS on ECG was observed in 224 (41.3%) patients. Considering the incidence rates at the end of 5.6 ± 1.3 years' follow-up, the total incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (P < .001), coronary artery disease (P < .001), and congestive heart failure (P < .001) were higher in patients with fragmented QRS. No significant dif- ference was observed between the two groups in terms of stroke (P = .734), cardiovas- cular death (P=1), and all-cause death (P=.574). As a result of multiple cox regression analysis, fragmented QRS (P = .005) was identified as an independent predictor for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events development.
CONCLUSION
In patients with hypertension, the presence of fragmented QRS was found as an independent predictor for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events development.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.