MedElevator
Войти в исследования Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2019
Immunohistochemical analysis of benign and malignant melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva using double-staining.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Soon Alexander K, Brownstein Seymour, Tang Tina, Saleh Solin, Jiang Kailun, Levac Joelle, Blanco Paula, Farmer James
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To implement a double-staining technique to identify the most sensitive and specific combinations of melanoma antigen recognized by T cells (Melan-A), microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), human melanoma black 45 (HMB45), and Ki67 aiming to assist in the diagnosis of atypical melanocytic conjunctival lesions that are more prone to malignant progression.
METHODS: Eight specimens of conjunctival melanoma and of primary acquired melanosis with moderate to severe atypia were double-immunostained with a combination of a cytoplasmic marker (anti-Melan-A or anti-HMB45), and a nuclear marker (anti-MITF or anti-Ki67). Eight specimens of normal conjunctiva and of conjunctival nevi served as controls. The specimens were processed using 3,3-diaminobenzidine substrate for nuclear stains and the fast-red substrate for cytoplasmic stains. Each slide was analyzed by light microscopy and provided a percent scale and a 0 to 4+ score for each nuclear and cytoplasmic component.
RESULTS: Melan-A and MITF were strongly positive markers for all melanocytic cells, whereas Ki67 and HMB45 provided a variable response for identifying potentially proliferative or aggressive cells. HMB45 and MITF proved to be the best combination for differentiating between atypical and benign lesions on a percent scale and a 0 to 4+ scale (p = 0.0004), with the 3 other combinations providing mainly confirmatory diagnostic information (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study used an immunohistochemical double-staining approach to differentiate between atypical and benign melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva. Our findings should aid in a more complete immunohistopathological diagnosis of conjunctival melanocytic lesions, particularly in diagnostically difficult cases.
METHODS: Eight specimens of conjunctival melanoma and of primary acquired melanosis with moderate to severe atypia were double-immunostained with a combination of a cytoplasmic marker (anti-Melan-A or anti-HMB45), and a nuclear marker (anti-MITF or anti-Ki67). Eight specimens of normal conjunctiva and of conjunctival nevi served as controls. The specimens were processed using 3,3-diaminobenzidine substrate for nuclear stains and the fast-red substrate for cytoplasmic stains. Each slide was analyzed by light microscopy and provided a percent scale and a 0 to 4+ score for each nuclear and cytoplasmic component.
RESULTS: Melan-A and MITF were strongly positive markers for all melanocytic cells, whereas Ki67 and HMB45 provided a variable response for identifying potentially proliferative or aggressive cells. HMB45 and MITF proved to be the best combination for differentiating between atypical and benign lesions on a percent scale and a 0 to 4+ scale (p = 0.0004), with the 3 other combinations providing mainly confirmatory diagnostic information (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study used an immunohistochemical double-staining approach to differentiate between atypical and benign melanocytic lesions of the conjunctiva. Our findings should aid in a more complete immunohistopathological diagnosis of conjunctival melanocytic lesions, particularly in diagnostically difficult cases.