MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.025

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2014

A review of cavernous malformations with trigeminal neuralgia.

Adachi Kazuhide, Hasegawa Mitsuhiro, Hayashi Takuro, Nagahisa Shinya, Hirose Yuichi

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Cavernous malformation with trigeminal neuralgia is relatively rare; only 10 cases have been reported. In deciding treatment strategies, it is helpful to classify cavernous malformation according to its origin, as follows: in the Gasserian ganglion (Type G); between the cisternal and intra-axial portions of the trigeminal nerve root (Type C); in the intra-axial trigeminal nerve root in the pons (Type P); or in the spinal tract of the trigeminal nerve root (Type S). A 62-year-old male presented with left trigeminal neuralgia (V2 area) and left facial hypoesthesia. Imaging studies revealed a cerebellopontine angle mass lesion with characteristics of a cavernous malformation and evidence of hemorrhage. The lesion was completely removed via a left anterior transpetrosal approach. The mass was attached to the trigeminal nerve root; it was located between the cisternal and intra-axial portions of the nerve root, and feeding off microvessels from the trigeminal nerve vascular plexus. Histological examination confirmed a cavernous malformation. In this case, the cavernous malformation was Type C. We review cases of cavernous malformation with trigeminal neuralgia and discuss therapeutic strategies according to the area of origin.

Для цитирования: Adachi Kazuhide, Hasegawa Mitsuhiro, Hayashi Takuro, Nagahisa Shinya, Hirose Yuichi. A review of cavernous malformations with trigeminal neuralgia.. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.025.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.