MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2147/imcrj.s138616

Медицинская библиотека · International medical case reports journal · 2017

Adenocarcinoma arising from a gastric duplication cyst: a case report and literature review.

Abdulla Maheeba Abdulla Mohamed, Al Saeed Mahmood, Ameer Alshaikh Safa, Nabar Umesh J

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Alimentary tract cystic duplication is a rare congenital anomaly predominantly affecting females, and diagnosed mostly in the early years of life.

CASE REPORT: We present here a case of a 51-year-old man presenting with a 2-day history of melena. Gastroscopy showed fresh blood, as well as a mass lesion and cavity at the fundus. Biopsies of the mass edge reported the occurrence of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma and mild chronic gastritis. Computed tomography imaging showed a 5.1×6.5 cm cystic mass in the gastric greater curvature. The patient received six cycles of epirubicin, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin, followed by uncomplicated total gastrectomy.

LITERATURE REVIEW: Data from all 11 reports of similar cases were reviewed and pooled. The result shows male predominance and variable symptoms, as well as a wide age range (25-76 years) at presentation. The cysts are commonly located along the greater curvature and are unilocular. Surgery was the treatment in most cases.

CONCLUSION

Alimentary tract cystic duplication is rare and may predispose to malignancy. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention is important for the best outcome.

Для цитирования: Abdulla Maheeba Abdulla Mohamed, Al Saeed Mahmood, Ameer Alshaikh Safa, Nabar Umesh J. Adenocarcinoma arising from a gastric duplication cyst: a case report and literature review.. International medical case reports journal. 2017. DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s138616.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.