MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102392

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in psychology · 2026

Good listening as a wise negotiation tactic.

Ren Zhiying Bella, Collins Hanne K

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Listening is a foundational interpersonal skill. Effective listening is central to managing the dual demands of negotiation: competing over limited resources while sustaining cooperation and trust. Nevertheless, limited research has shed light on how to listen effectively in negotiation. Integrating research from psychology, communication, and negotiation, we identify three common listening traps that undermine negotiation effectiveness: negotiators tend to focus too much on: (1) the self (and too little on others); (2) resolving disagreement (and too little on exploring it); and (3) what is said (and too little on what remains unspoken). We propose three approaches for effective listening in negotiations: (1) listening to understand rather than persuade; (2) listening for movement and change; and (3) making listening observable through concrete verbal and nonverbal behaviors. We argue that high-quality listening improves both informational and relational outcomes by facilitating deeper information exchange, increasing trust, and supporting integrative agreements. By highlighting high-quality listening as a wise negotiation tactic, this article illustrates how negotiators can better navigate the tension between cooperation and competition in mixed-motive interactions.

Для цитирования: Ren Zhiying Bella, Collins Hanne K. Good listening as a wise negotiation tactic.. Current opinion in psychology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102392.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.