MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/tme.12271

Медицинская библиотека · Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2016

Phenotyping Rh/Kell and risk of alloimmunization in haematological patients.

Baía F, Correia F, Alves B, Martinez F, Koch C, Carneiro A, Araújo F

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

One of the biggest concerns in transfusion medicine is to avoid red blood cell alloimmunization. We evaluated the rate of alloimmunization in two groups of chronically transfused patients (A - not phenotyped and B - phenotyped for Rh/K antigens before the first transfusion) with primary haematological disorders and its distribution among the main haematological diseases, in order to adopt an efficient transfusional strategy.

STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS

As methodology, we used the SIBAS and SAM databases for the retrospective study of all patients with primary haematological disorder between January 2011 and April 2013.

RESULTS

A statistical difference in the rate of alloimmunization comparing groups A and B was found (P <0·0001). We also observed that alloimmunization was not homogeneously distributed in all primary haematological diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

The Rh/K phenotype should be performed on all patients diagnosed with bone marrow failure, plasma cell dyscrasia and myelodysplastic syndrome in order to avoid alloimmunization. In patients with acute leukaemia and lymphoma it seems not necessary to perform it. In patients with haemoglobinopathy and myeloproliferative disorders, a larger group of patients is needed to decide its efficacy.

Для цитирования: Baía F, Correia F, Alves B, Martinez F, Koch C, Carneiro A, Araújo F. Phenotyping Rh/Kell and risk of alloimmunization in haematological patients.. Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England). 2016. DOI: 10.1111/tme.12271.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.