F&S reports · 2021
Is there still a role for a cleavage-stage embryo transfer?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Neblett Michael F, Kim Tana, Jones Tiffanny L, Baumgarten Sarah C, Coddington Charles C, Zhao Yulian, Shenoy Chandra C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pregnancy outcomes are poor or futile when an intended day 5 transfer is converted to a cleavage-stage transfer because of poor embryo development or a lower number of embryos.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
PATIENTS: Women with a limited number of embryos, defined as ≤6 two pronuclear embryos, after in vitro fertilization.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients who had a cleavage-stage transfer were age matched with patients who had a day 5 transfer.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Live birth rate.
RESULTS: A total of 146 women were included in the study with 73 women in each group. Cleavage-stage transfer was associated with significantly lower implantation and clinical pregnancy rates compared with those of day 5 transfer. Although the live birth rate of the cleavage-stage transfer group was lower than that of the day 5 transfer group (25% vs. 40%, respectively), the cleavage-stage transfer still resulted in a live birth rate of 25%. A subanalysis comparing women who did and did not achieve live birth after cleavage-stage transfer demonstrated a live birth rate of 27% when at least one grade A embryo was transferred vs. 17% when a lesser quality embryo (grade B or C) was transferred.
CONCLUSIONS: As expected, the live birth rate after cleavage-stage transfer was lower than that after day 5 transfer. However, the live birth rate of cleavage-stage transfer still fell into acceptable practice, >5%, for patients who were otherwise at very high risk of having no day 5 embryo transfer. Extended culture may not be necessary for all patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
PATIENTS: Women with a limited number of embryos, defined as ≤6 two pronuclear embryos, after in vitro fertilization.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients who had a cleavage-stage transfer were age matched with patients who had a day 5 transfer.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Live birth rate.
RESULTS: A total of 146 women were included in the study with 73 women in each group. Cleavage-stage transfer was associated with significantly lower implantation and clinical pregnancy rates compared with those of day 5 transfer. Although the live birth rate of the cleavage-stage transfer group was lower than that of the day 5 transfer group (25% vs. 40%, respectively), the cleavage-stage transfer still resulted in a live birth rate of 25%. A subanalysis comparing women who did and did not achieve live birth after cleavage-stage transfer demonstrated a live birth rate of 27% when at least one grade A embryo was transferred vs. 17% when a lesser quality embryo (grade B or C) was transferred.
CONCLUSIONS: As expected, the live birth rate after cleavage-stage transfer was lower than that after day 5 transfer. However, the live birth rate of cleavage-stage transfer still fell into acceptable practice, >5%, for patients who were otherwise at very high risk of having no day 5 embryo transfer. Extended culture may not be necessary for all patients.