Nebulized Epinephrine Versus Placebo in Infants with Moderate-to-Severe Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background

International guidelines do not support the routine use of nebulized epinephrine for acute viral bronchiolitis. Despite its vasoconstrictive and bronchodilator properties, evidence remains inconclusive.

Objectives

Day-6 fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) adjusted for baseline FiO2 was designated as the principal outcome; however, this outcome hierarchy was not prospectively prespecified. The analysis compared day-6 FiO2, adjusted for baseline FiO2, between nebulized racemic epinephrine and placebo; peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RR), and heart rate (HR) were secondary outcomes.

Methods

This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 26 infants aged 0-12 months with moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis requiring respiratory support. Participants were allocated 1:1 to nebulized racemic epinephrine (group A, n = 13) or isotonic saline placebo (group B, n = 13). Outcomes were measured at baseline (T0), day 3 (T1), and day 6 (T2). The primary analysis used ANCOVA to compare T2 FiO2 while adjusting for T0 FiO2; mixed repeated-measures ANOVA assessed longitudinal trajectories.

Results

The adjusted T2 FiO2 difference between groups was -0.43 percentage points (95% CI -3.43 to 2.57; p = 0.772). Adjusted T2 differences were also non-significant for SpO2 (p = 0.058), RR (p = 0.093), and HR (p = 0.487). FiO2 decreased over time (p = 1.99 × 10-4), but the group-by-time interaction was not significant (p = 0.108); no interaction was observed for SpO2, RR, or HR (p = 0.296, p = 0.187, and p = 0.352, respectively).

Conclusions

Nebulized racemic epinephrine did not improve the trajectories of oxygen requirement, SpO2, RR, or HR compared with placebo; improvements over time were observed in both groups.