Incidence of Frey's syndrome after submandibular gland excision: Minor's test-based evaluation.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the incidence and clinical characteristics of Frey's syndrome following submandibular gland excision using objective diagnostic methods.
METHODS
Medical records of 28 patients who underwent submandibular gland excision between January 2016 and December 2018 were reviewed. Frey's syndrome was diagnosed using the Minor's starch-iodine test, and symptom severity was graded according to the Luna-Ortiz scoring system, which incorporates symptom perception, affected area, and sweating intensity. Patients with less than six weeks of follow-up or with a history of head and neck trauma or unrelated surgical procedures were excluded.
RESULTS
Frey's syndrome was identified in 3 of 28 patients (10.7%). Two cases were classified as mild (7.1%) and one as severe (3.6%). While one patient reported subjective symptoms, the other two were diagnosed solely through Minor's starch-iodine test. The average time to diagnosis was 31.7 months postoperatively. No association was observed between Frey's syndrome and patient age, sex, or underlying pathology. The severe case responded well to botulinum toxin injection, resulting in complete resolution of symptoms.
CONCLUSION
Although Frey's syndrome is a well-known complication of parotid gland surgery, it may also occur after submandibular gland excision, often in subclinical forms that are easily overlooked. This study highlights the diagnostic value of Minor's starch-iodine test in detecting such cases. Future studies should focus on identifying surgical techniques and patient factors associated with increased risk to guide selective postoperative surveillance and informed patient counseling following submandibular gland excision.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.