DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.106092
Access to Mental Health Providers Among Older Adults With ADRD Using Telemedicine.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To examine whether having tele-mental health (tele-MH) visits with new providers is different by race, ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, and rurality.
DESIGN
Retrospective study.
SETTING AND
PARTICIPANTS
This study linked 2019 and 2021 Medicare claims data. We included community-dwelling Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias who had at least 1 tele-MH visit in 2021.
METHODS
The outcome variable was whether an individual had tele-MH visits with new providers in 2021, compared with providers they had in 2019, measured by comparing the list of providers they had visits with using Medicare outpatient claims data. The main variables of interest were race, ethnicity, Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility, and rurality, measured using the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File. Logistic regression models, with zip code-level random effects, were estimated while accounting for individual- and community-level characteristics.
RESULTS
The analytical sample included 99,329 individuals, of whom 53.6% had MH care with new providers via tele-MH services in 2021. After accounting for individual- and community-level characteristics, Black individuals [odds ratio (OR), 1.158; 95% CI, 1.096-1.222; P < .01], Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligibles (OR, 1.066; 95% CI, 1.027-1.105; P < .01), and rural residents (1.215; 95% CI, 1.125-1.312; P < .01) were more likely to have tele-MH visits with new providers compared with their White, nondual-eligible, and metropolitan counterparts, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Telemedicine may improve MH care access for underserved populations by facilitating connections with new MH providers.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.