The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
The economic burden of mental disorders: results from the Netherlands mental health survey and incidence study-2.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wijnen B F M, Ten Have M, de Graaf R, van der Hoek H J, Lokkerbol J, Smit Filip
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Currently, there is a paucity of up-to-date estimates of the economic burden caused by mental disorders. Such information could provide vital insight into one of the most serious and costly-yet to some extent preventable-health challenges facing the world today.
METHOD: Data from a national psychiatric-epidemiological cohort study (NEMESIS-2, N = 6506) were used to provide reliable, relevant, and up-to-date cost estimates (in 2019 Euro) regarding healthcare costs, productivity losses, and patient and family costs associated with DSM-IV mental disorders both at individual level, but also in the general population and in the workforce of the Netherlands (per 1 million population).
RESULTS: In the general population, the costs of mood disorders, specifically depression, are substantial and rank above those from the anxiety disorders, whilst costs of anxiety disorders are more substantial than those stemming from substance use disorders, even when the per-person costs of drug abuse appear highest of all. In the workforce, specific and social phobias are leading causes of excess costs. The workforce has lower healthcare costs but higher productivity costs than general population.
DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that (preventive) healthcare interventions targeting the workforce are likely to become cost-effective and underscore the importance for employers to create healthy work environments. Overall, the results highlight the need to strengthen the role of mental health promotion and prevention of mental disorders in the social domain before people require treatment to reduce the staggering and costly burden caused by mental disorders to individuals and society.
METHOD: Data from a national psychiatric-epidemiological cohort study (NEMESIS-2, N = 6506) were used to provide reliable, relevant, and up-to-date cost estimates (in 2019 Euro) regarding healthcare costs, productivity losses, and patient and family costs associated with DSM-IV mental disorders both at individual level, but also in the general population and in the workforce of the Netherlands (per 1 million population).
RESULTS: In the general population, the costs of mood disorders, specifically depression, are substantial and rank above those from the anxiety disorders, whilst costs of anxiety disorders are more substantial than those stemming from substance use disorders, even when the per-person costs of drug abuse appear highest of all. In the workforce, specific and social phobias are leading causes of excess costs. The workforce has lower healthcare costs but higher productivity costs than general population.
DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that (preventive) healthcare interventions targeting the workforce are likely to become cost-effective and underscore the importance for employers to create healthy work environments. Overall, the results highlight the need to strengthen the role of mental health promotion and prevention of mental disorders in the social domain before people require treatment to reduce the staggering and costly burden caused by mental disorders to individuals and society.