MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jar.12723

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2020

Experiences of service users with a mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning with Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: A qualitative study.

Neijmeijer Laura, Kuiper Chris, Kroon Hans, Didden Robert

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In the Netherlands, Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) teams have been established for people with mild intellectual disability (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and mental health problems or challenging behaviour. Little is known yet about service users' experiences with FACT.

METHOD: An inductive grounded theory approach was used to explore how service users valued the treatment and their own functioning, and which factors were perceived as supportive. Semi-structured interviews were held with 15 service users.

RESULTS

Most service users highly appreciated the contact with the staff and the practical and emotional support. Persistent involvement, availability and humanity, and respect for autonomy were distinguished as core values in the relationship with the staff. Most service users experienced improvement in time and attributed this to intrapersonal changes and/or less stress in life.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of service users with MID/BIF, FACT appears to have an added value.

Для цитирования: Neijmeijer Laura, Kuiper Chris, Kroon Hans, Didden Robert. Experiences of service users with a mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning with Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: A qualitative study.. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12723.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.