MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7205/milmed-d-13-00375

Медицинская библиотека · Military medicine · 2014

Surgical management of modern combat-related pancreatic injuries: traditional management and unique strategies.

Vertrees Amy, Elster Eric, Jindal Rahul M, Ricordi Camillo, Shriver Craig

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Management of war-related pancreatic injuries is challenging with potential for associated concomitant injuries and complications.

METHODS

Retrospective record review of patients treated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center sustaining pancreatic injury during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2003 to 2009 was carried out.

RESULTS

Pancreatic injuries occurred in 31 of 522 (7%) patients, with the average age of 28 (range 19-54). Mechanism of injury included gunshot (68%), blast injuries (23%), and blunt injuries (10%). Distal pancreatic injuries were treated with distal pancreatectomy (55%) or drainage (45%). Head of the pancreas injuries were treated with drainage (86%). Four patients with unspecified anatomic location underwent drainage only. One patient underwent emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure) followed by completion pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation.

CONCLUSION

Management of war-related pancreatic injuries varied based on the anatomic location. Head of the pancreas injuries were primarily managed with drainage. Distal injuries were treated with resection or drainage. Autologous islet cell transplantation is a feasible option.

Для цитирования: Vertrees Amy, Elster Eric, Jindal Rahul M, Ricordi Camillo, Shriver Craig. Surgical management of modern combat-related pancreatic injuries: traditional management and unique strategies.. Military medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-13-00375.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.