Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2011
Cultural and linguistic validation of acne-QoL in French.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan J, O'Toole A, Zhang X, Dreno B, Poulin Y
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acne-Quality of Life (acne-QoL) is a facial acne-specific quality-of-life instrument developed in English.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to translate and validate acne-QoL in French and to establish the reliability and responsivity of this measure.
METHODS: Acne-QoL was translated into French (acne-QoLfr) in accordance with international methodological recommendations. The validated French version of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADIfr) was used as a comparator. Acne patients in Quebec (n = 20) and France (n = 14) completed the acne-QoLfr and CADIfr on three occasions over 3 months (day 0, day 2-3, day 60-90).
RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were recruited. Pearson's correlation for total acne-QoLfr scores at day 0 and day 2-3 was 0.77. Of the four domains comprising the acne-QoLfr, correlations were highest for symptoms (0.85) and lowest for the role-emotional domain (0.66). At day 60-90, total acne-QoLfr scores increased by a mean of 19.7 points, reflecting improved quality-of-life with acne therapy and demonstrating responsivity of the instrument.
CONCLUSION: Acne-QoLfr is a linguistically and culturally validated tool for facial acne that is both reliable and responsive.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to translate and validate acne-QoL in French and to establish the reliability and responsivity of this measure.
METHODS: Acne-QoL was translated into French (acne-QoLfr) in accordance with international methodological recommendations. The validated French version of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADIfr) was used as a comparator. Acne patients in Quebec (n = 20) and France (n = 14) completed the acne-QoLfr and CADIfr on three occasions over 3 months (day 0, day 2-3, day 60-90).
RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were recruited. Pearson's correlation for total acne-QoLfr scores at day 0 and day 2-3 was 0.77. Of the four domains comprising the acne-QoLfr, correlations were highest for symptoms (0.85) and lowest for the role-emotional domain (0.66). At day 60-90, total acne-QoLfr scores increased by a mean of 19.7 points, reflecting improved quality-of-life with acne therapy and demonstrating responsivity of the instrument.
CONCLUSION: Acne-QoLfr is a linguistically and culturally validated tool for facial acne that is both reliable and responsive.