MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04193.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2011

Cultural and linguistic validation of acne-QoL in French.

Tan J, O'Toole A, Zhang X, Dreno B, Poulin Y

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Acne-Quality of Life (acne-QoL) is a facial acne-specific quality-of-life instrument developed in English.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to translate and validate acne-QoL in French and to establish the reliability and responsivity of this measure.

METHODS

Acne-QoL was translated into French (acne-QoLfr) in accordance with international methodological recommendations. The validated French version of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADIfr) was used as a comparator. Acne patients in Quebec (n = 20) and France (n = 14) completed the acne-QoLfr and CADIfr on three occasions over 3 months (day 0, day 2-3, day 60-90).

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were recruited. Pearson's correlation for total acne-QoLfr scores at day 0 and day 2-3 was 0.77. Of the four domains comprising the acne-QoLfr, correlations were highest for symptoms (0.85) and lowest for the role-emotional domain (0.66). At day 60-90, total acne-QoLfr scores increased by a mean of 19.7 points, reflecting improved quality-of-life with acne therapy and demonstrating responsivity of the instrument.

CONCLUSION

Acne-QoLfr is a linguistically and culturally validated tool for facial acne that is both reliable and responsive.

Для цитирования: Tan J, O'Toole A, Zhang X, Dreno B, Poulin Y. Cultural and linguistic validation of acne-QoL in French.. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04193.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.