MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_527_25

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025

Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Mouthwash and Denture Cleanser in the Removal of Candida Albicans from Two Flexible Denture Base Materials - An In vitro Study.

Teja B V H Ravi, Babu Jayakrishna, Sunkala Lokesh, Chander V Bhanu, Karthik K V Gurucharan, Alex Jisa A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Poly-methyl methacrylate is the most common denture base material but has limitations. Flexible denture base materials, such as Lucitone FRS and Valplast, were introduced to address these issues. Denture success depends on preventing microbial attachment and easy cleaning. This study evaluates the efficacy of Clinsodent denture cleanser and 0.2% Chlorhexidine (Rexidine) mouthwash in removing Candida albicans from these materials.

METHODOLOGY: Forty-eight specimens were subdivided into three groups, with eight in each. After inoculation with Candida albicans, samples were treated with distilled water (control), 0.2% Rexidine mouthwash, or Clinsodent cleanser. Colony counts were analyzed.

RESULTS

Rexidine mouthwash was more effective than Clinsodent. Valplast showed higher initial Candida growth, indicating Lucitone FRS is more resistant.

CONCLUSION

0.2% Rexidine mouthwash was superior in Candida removal, and Lucitone FRS exhibited greater resistance than Valplast.

Для цитирования: Teja B V H Ravi, Babu Jayakrishna, Sunkala Lokesh, Chander V Bhanu, Karthik K V Gurucharan, Alex Jisa A. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Mouthwash and Denture Cleanser in the Removal of Candida Albicans from Two Flexible Denture Base Materials - An In vitro Study.. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2025. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_527_25.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.